| Ranking of Clusters (as per data available in RurbanSoft) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sl No | Category - On-ground performance / Key Process | Parameter | Basis of measuring Parameter | Weightage | Quantitative Performance |
| 1 | On-ground performance | CGF Expenditure as per State Brief | % of CGF Expenditure against total CGF investment | 20 | Value/20 |
| 2 | Convergence Expenditure as per State Brief | % of Convergence Expenditure against total convergence investment | 20 | Value/20 | |
| 3 | Work Completed | % of Completed Works against work taken up in DPR | 10 | Value/10 | |
| 4 | Key Process | ICAP entered in RurbanSoft and approved by Ministry | Yes / No | 3 | 3 for Yes/ 0 For No |
| 5 | SLEC approved DPR entered in RurbanSoft | Yes / No | 3 | 3 for Yes/ 0 For No | |
| 6 | Planning Notification | Yes / No | 3 | 3 for Yes/ 0 For No | |
| 7 | Work Details Entry | % Work Detailed Entered against Total works in DPR | 5 | Value/5 | |
| 8 | PFMS Payment Started | Yes / No | 10 | 10 for Yes/ 0 For No | |
| 9 | Convergence Expenditure Entry | % Convergence Expenditure as per Convergence Expenditure Record against Sum of Convergence Expenditure filled in State Brief | 3 | Value/3 | |
| 10 | CGF Expenditure Entry | % CGF Expenditure as per Previous Payment Record + PFMS Payment against Sum of CGF Expenditure filled in State Brief | 3 | Value/3 | |
| 11 | Geotagging | % of Works Geotagged against work taken up in DPR | 10 | Value/10 | |
| 12 | DPMU / CDMU recruited | (DPMU + CDMU recruited) / 2 | 10 | Value / 10 (max. 10) | |
| Total Marks Obtained | Total 100 marks | ||||